What is a Marking System ?Marking and grading ?  and what types are there?

• • 
  • “Through instruction, critical examination, and exposure to new concepts, learning allows us to develop knowledge and skills.” Dr. Havugimana Alexis.

Marking System is a type of  approach to evaluating student performance, which  involves assigning scores or grades to different aspects of a student’s work, such as essays, projects, or tests, to gauge their understanding and mastery of the subject matter. The marking system is one of the most traditional forms of student assessment. It involves assigning numerical or descriptive scores to specific components of a student’s work. For example, in a written exam, each question may be worth a specific number of marks, and the student’s responses are scored based on their accuracy, clarity, and depth of understanding. These marks are then added together to give a total score, which reflects the student’s performance on the entire assessment.

“Effective marking is an essential part of the education process. At its heart, it is an interaction between teacher and pupil: a way of acknowledging pupils’ work, checking the outcomes and making decisions about what teachers and pupils need to do next, with the primary aim of driving pupil progress. This can often be achieved without extensive written dialogue or comments.”

The system of assigning marks often comes under scrutiny for its fairness, accuracy, and ability to truly reflect student learning

Qualifications currently available in all countries  include examples of both mark-based and grade-based approaches to assessment. Mark-based approaches require assessors to assign numerical marks to candidates’ work, assisted by a mark scheme. Grade-based approaches avoid marks altogether, and require assessors to assign grades by evaluating candidates’ work against grading criteria. These are statements that set out the knowledge or skills that must be demonstrated to gain a particular grade (e.g., “Deliver sports/activity sessions using effective communication” in a Sports qualification)

Drawbacks of the marking system

• • Subjectivity: Marking can be highly subjective, as teachers may interpret a student’s work differently depending on their personal biases or expectations. Even though there may be rubrics in place, a degree of subjectivity often remains.

• • Measurement errors: Because marking typically involves assessing individual components separately, errors in judgment or inconsistency in marking can occur, leading to unfair scores.

• • Lack of context: Marking systems tend to focus on specific tasks or assignments, without providing a broader picture of a student’s overall progress. As a result, students may not receive a clear understanding of how their learning is developing over time.

The main parts of Marking system in Education  :

1.Setting up the main Learning Objectives  and Outcomes :Clear goals or what the students are expected to learn or achieve.

2.Designing the Assessment Tool :Creating tests, exams, assignments, or practical tasks that measure the learning objectives.

3. Preparing the Marking Scheme / Rubric :A guideline or framework that defines how marks will be allocated (per question or criteria).Ensures consistency and fairness.

4. Administering the Assessment Giving the students the actual test or assignment under exam conditions.

5.Marking the Scripts / Work Reviewing student answers and awarding scores according to the marking scheme.

6. Recording the Marks :Writing down or entering the awarded scores into a record system (e.g., gradebook or database).

7. Moderation / Verification (optional but important) A second check to ensure fairness, accuracy, and no bias in marking.

8. Converting Marks into Grades :Applying a grading scale to convert raw marks into grades (e.g., A, B, C or Distinction, Pass, etc.)

9. Analyzing Performance : Checking patterns in student results, class averages, pass rates, etc.

10. Providing Feedback : Informing students about their performance, mistakes, and areas of improvement.

11. Reporting the Results :Sharing final results with students, parents, or educational authorities (through report cards or transcripts).

12. Archiving Results and Documentation :Safely storing all marks and grades for future reference, official use, or audits and documents others system.

Types of Marking Systems

In education ,Common types  include letter grades (A, B, C, etc.), numerical grades (e.g., percentages), pass/fail, and standards-based grading where achievement is assessed against specific learning objectives. Other systems include narrative reports, norm-referenced grading (comparing students to each other), and mastery grading (assessing if a specific level of knowledge has been reached),These refer to how students’ work is assessed and scored:

1. Numerical Marking System :Marks are given as numbers out of a total score.

Example: 78/100 or 15/20.

2. Percentage Marking System

Scores are converted to percentages.

Example: 80% = 80 marks out of 100.

3. Letter Grade System

Marks are grouped into grade ranges.

Example:A = 80–100 ,B = 70–79 ,C = 60–69, D = 50–59,F = below 50

4. Grade Point Average (GPA) System

Used mostly in higher education,Converts grades into points, then averages them.

Example:A = 4.0, B = 3.0, etc.

5. Rubric-Based Marking

Marks are based on specific criteria (e.g., grammar, content, creativity).Each part is scored separately and summed.

6. Descriptive Marking :Teachers or Lecturer  provide written comments instead of numbers or grades.

Example: “Excellent understanding of the topic.”

7. Competency-Based or Mastery Marking

Focuses on whether a student has achieved specific skills.

Example: “Achieved” or “Not Yet Achieved”.

Types of Reporting Systems

These refer to how the results are communicated to students, parents, or institutions:

1. Report Cards

Traditional way to report term/semester results, Includes marks, grades, teacher comments, and attendance.

2. Transcript Reporting ;Official summary of student performance over a period (e.g., full academic year or program).Used for graduation or higher education applications.

3. Narrative Reports ; Detailed written descriptions of a student’s performance, behavior, and progress.Common in lower primary or special education.

4. Portfolio Reporting ;A collection of student work over time, showing growth and achievements.Used in project-based learning or continuous assessment.

5. Online or Digital Reporting ;Results shared through school management systems, emails, or apps.Fast, accessible, and may include graphs or visuals.

6. Parent-Teacher Conferences ;In-person or virtual meetings where teachers discuss student progress directly with parents.

Guidelines for Developing a Multiple Marking and Reporting System   

1. Should be guided by the functions to be served  
2. Should be developed cooperatively by parents, students, and school personnel 

3. Should be based on a clear statement of educational objectives  
4. Should be based on adequate assessment  
5. Should be detailed enough to be diagnostic and yet compact enough to be practical  
6. Should provide for parent-teacher conferences   

Who makes the decision about what an “A” is? Who makes the decision about what an “A” is?  

Assigning Letter Grades  

1. Determining what to include in a letter grade  

Your grades must communicate clearly to parents, students, and administrators. If you include factors other than achievement toward academic objectives, how will parents, students, and administrators know what a grade of A means? I do include a test question on this issue in the final exam.   

2. Combining data in assigning grades   

Grades must be weighted, because most teachers will want to give greater weight to tests than to homework and greater weight to projects than to classwork.   

 Raw score — the number a student gets right; is not useful by itself  

  Percent — the raw score divided by the total number of points possible  

  Weighted — assigning varying amounts that each assignment contributes to the whole and multiplying that weight by the percent earned; 

Example: 

If you made a 80% on the mid-term and if the mid-term counted for 45 points out of 100, you multiply .80 by 45 and obtain the number of points you earned for the mid-term (= 36). 

If you add this to the 10 you can earn for homework, you have 46. To earn an A (at least a 90%), you would need to get 45 out of the 50 questions correct on the final. 45 + 46 = 91!  

  Composite — when you add all of the assignments together to obtain the final grade for the quarter / semester for an individual student. In the example above, 36 + 10 + 45 = 91, 91 is the composite score.  

3. Selecting the proper frame of reference for grading  

A. In relation to other group members; this is norm-referenced  

When you create a normal distribution from scores in most classrooms, you are imposing a structure that does not normally exist. Normal distributions occur when the number in your group is greater than 100 AND when you know you have students who vary greatly in ability. These criteria (large group size and varying abilities) do occur for those who create standardized tests. They are not typical of a classroom — thankfully. To give you a demonstration here is an example of midterm grades with a normal distribution imposed on them. I am combining classes for a total of 48 students.   

2% of the students get A = 1 student  
14% of the students get B = 7 students  
68% of the students get C = 32 students  
14% of the students get D = 7 students  
2% of the students get F = 1 student  

Then you rank the scores from highest to lowest and count out 1 A, 7 B’s, 32 C’s, 7 D’s, and 1 F.  

98 = A  
————-  

96  all these are B’s  
96  
94  
92  
92  
91  
91  
———–  

90 all these are C’s  
90  
90  
88  
88  
88  
87  
87  
87  
85  
85  
85  
85  
83  
83  
83  
83  
83  
81  
81  
81  
79  
79  
79  
79  
77  
77  
77  
77  
75  
72  
72  
——————  

71 all these are D’s  
71  
71  
71  
69  
67  
65  
——————-  

60 = F  

It should be evident that this creates competition and leaves the impression of unfairness. After all, if you can answer most of the questions correctly why shouldn’t your grade reflect that instead of reflecting your rank in this particular class (group of students). This is frequently a test question on the final exam. 
 B. In relation to specified standards; this is criterion-referenced  

This is how I grade. If you have mastered 90% or more of the objectives, you earn an A; 80-89% a B, 70-79% a C, 60-69% a D, and 59% or below an F.  

C. In relation to learning ability; no reference point beyond the individual student; do teachers really know a student’s learning ability? What other factors influence learning?   

D. In relation to amount of improvement; no reference point beyond the individual student; other factors influence learning other than sheer effort.  

How marks are assigned: The mathematical approach to scoring exams :

In most educational systems, including India’s, marks are awarded based on the performance of students during exams, assignments, and other assessments. However, the process of assigning marks is far from straightforward. It is not just about the student’s answer to a question; it is a process governed by specific rules and mathematical principles. Let’s break it down.

What is the marking scheme? 

The marking scheme is the blueprint or guideline that teachers and examiners use to assign marks. This scheme outlines the correct answers, how much weight each answer or section carries, and what points should be considered when evaluating a student’s response. A well-constructed marking scheme helps ensure consistency in grading and ensures that all students are evaluated on the same criteria.

The mathematical formula behind scoring 

In many cases, exams are scored using a rubric or numerical scoring system. For example, a typical exam may have a maximum of 100 marks, and each section or question may carry a fixed number of points. A multiple-choice exam may award 1 point per correct answer, whereas an essay-style exam may be graded on a scale from 1 to 10 for each criterion (such as content, structure, clarity, etc.).

Mathematically, the process is quite simple: the total marks are divided based on the weightage of each question or section. For example, if an exam has 5 questions, each worth 20 marks, the total would be 100 marks. The student’s score would then be calculated by adding the marks awarded to each individual answer, ensuring the total aligns with the weightage given in the marking scheme.

Subjective vs. objective marking 

The key difference between subjective and objective exams lies in the approach to marking. Objective exams (such as multiple-choice questions) are relatively straightforward to score mathematically. However, subjective exams (such as essays, case studies, and open-ended questions) often involve more judgment and interpretation on the part of the examiner. This brings us to the next crucial point: errors in marking.

Errors in marking: The human element 

While mathematical formulas can handle objective assessments with precision, subjective exams are more prone to errors. These errors arise from several factors, including examiner subjectivity, test design, and test administration. Let’s explore these in more detail.

Examiner subjectivity 

One of the biggest challenges in the marking system is examiner subjectivity. Even with a well-defined marking scheme, no two examiners are likely to interpret a student’s response in the exact same way. For example, two teachers marking the same essay might have different opinions on what constitutes a strong argument or effective writing style. This subjectivity can lead to inconsistency in grading and unfair assessments of student ability.

In India, where high-stakes exams like the CBSE or university-level exams are often marked by different teachers or even in different locations, this inconsistency becomes even more pronounced. While examiners are trained to follow the marking scheme, personal biases, fatigue, and other external factors can still influence the final marks a student receives.

Test design issues 

The design of the test itself can also contribute to marking errors. For instance, poorly worded questions can confuse students and lead to incorrect or incomplete answers. In some cases, even if a student understands the concept, they might struggle with articulating it due to vague or complex wording. In such cases, the examiner may incorrectly penalize the student for something that wasn’t their fault.

Additionally, when exams are too broad or too narrow in focus, they fail to capture the full range of a student’s knowledge and abilities. This can lead to marks that don’t truly reflect a student’s understanding. For example, if a test is heavily focused on rote learning, a student with strong critical thinking skills may score poorly even though they understand the material better than someone who memorized answers.

Test administration problems 

Sometimes, errors in marking aren’t caused by the examiners themselves, but by issues in test administration. A common problem arises when the exam is poorly organized, resulting in incomplete or lost answer sheets, unfair exam conditions (such as overcrowded exam halls), or discrepancies in how the exams are marked across different locations. These errors can negatively affect the reliability of marks and reduce the fairness of the entire process.

Limitations of marking: Why marks do not always reflect true student ability 

Despite the widespread use of marks as an indicator of academic achievement, marks often fail to capture a student’s full potential. There are several reasons why marks may not always reflect true ability, and these limitations are important to understand for both students and educators alike.

Marks are context-dependent 

Marks are often dependent on the specific context of the exam or assignment. For example, a student who excels in one type of exam format (e.g., multiple-choice) may struggle with others (e.g., essay-style questions). Some students may perform better in a high-pressure exam setting, while others may need more time to process and reflect on questions. These differences in exam conditions can create disparities in scores that don’t necessarily reflect a student’s true abilities.

External factors influencing performance 

External factors like stress, health issues, or personal problems can also negatively impact a student’s performance on an exam. These factors are not related to a student’s intellectual ability or knowledge of the subject matter, but they can significantly affect the marks a student receives. Since exams are often timed and occur under fixed conditions, there’s little room for flexibility or understanding of such external factors.

Rote learning vs. deep understanding 

In many education systems, including India’s, there is a strong emphasis on rote learning—memorizing information without necessarily understanding its deeper meaning. This approach can lead to high marks for students who are skilled at memorization but may not have a deep understanding of the material. On the other hand, students who focus on conceptual understanding and critical thinking might receive lower marks if their answers are not aligned with what the examiner expects or if they struggle to recall specific details. Thus, marks may fail to capture a student’s true grasp of the subject.

The narrowing of skills assessed 

Marks primarily measure a limited set of academic skills, such as recall, comprehension, and problem-solving. However, these exams typically do not assess other important qualities, such as creativity, teamwork, communication, or emotional intelligence. A student may be incredibly talented in areas that are not evaluated in exams but still be marked poorly because the exams focus on only one aspect of their abilities. Thus, marks become an incomplete representation of a student’s potential.

How to improve marking reliability: Reducing errors and ensuring fairness 

Given the various issues discussed above, it is crucial to find ways to improve the reliability and fairness of the marking system. Here are some strategies that can help:

Training and standardization for examiners 

One effective way to reduce errors is by providing comprehensive training for examiners. This training should cover both the marking scheme and how to minimize subjectivity in grading. Additionally, regular moderation or cross-marking between multiple examiners can help ensure that the marking process remains consistent. Standardizing the training process across examiners can reduce biases and improve reliability.

Using rubrics for subjective exams 

For subjective exams, using a detailed rubric can improve consistency in grading. A rubric breaks down the criteria into specific areas (such as content accuracy, structure, clarity, and grammar) and assigns a point value to each area. By clearly defining what is expected in each section of an answer, rubrics help ensure that students are marked fairly and consistently.

Incorporating alternative forms of assessment 

One way to mitigate the limitations of traditional exams is to use alternative forms of assessment, such as project-based evaluations, peer assessments, or presentations. These forms of assessment allow students to demonstrate their abilities in different ways, offering a more holistic view of their learning. For example, project-based assessments test not only knowledge but also problem-solving, creativity, and practical application, which exams often fail to measure.

Feedback and continuous assessment 

Finally, providing feedback to students is one of the most important aspects of improving the marking system. Regular feedback helps students understand their mistakes and learn from them, improving their future performance. Additionally, continuous assessment throughout the course, rather than relying solely on final exams, can provide a more accurate and fair evaluation of a student’s progress and capabilities.

What do you think? Do you feel that marks truly reflect student ability, or is there a need for more holistic assessment methods? How do you think education systems can improve the marking process for better fairness and accuracy?

What is the grading system? 

On the other hand, the grading system offers a more holistic approach to assessment. In this system, a student’s performance is evaluated based on a broader spectrum, typically with letter grades (A, B, C, etc.) or grade point averages (GPA). These grades are usually assigned based on a combination of factors, such as overall exam performance, assignments, class participation, and sometimes even attendance. Instead of focusing on the individual components of a task, grading reflects the student’s overall achievement or learning outcomes across a range of activities.

Grading systems aim to offer a simpler and more standardized way to evaluate students. In many cases, grades are also accompanied by a general description or feedback, but the focus is on the broader picture rather than detailed marks for individual tasks.

Benefits of the grading system 

• • Holistic evaluation: Grading systems often evaluate students based on a range of activities and outcomes, giving a more comprehensive picture of their overall learning. This helps address the problem of measurement errors that can arise from focusing on individual marks.

• • Consistency and fairness: Grading offers a more standardized and consistent approach. Grades are typically subject to clear criteria or rubrics, which help minimize subjective biases and errors in judgment.

• • Motivation: Many students are motivated by grades because they provide an easily understandable benchmark for success. A clear goal (e.g., achieving an A grade) can encourage students to improve and focus on their overall learning.

• • Comparative measure: Grades offer a way to compare students across different institutions, classes, or academic systems. This is particularly helpful in higher education, where GPA is used as a criterion for scholarships, admissions, and job placements.

Marking vs grading: key differences 

Now that we’ve covered the basics of both systems, let’s explore the key differences between marking and grading in more detail:

1. Focus and Scope 

The most significant difference between marking and grading is the scope of assessment. Marking is often focused on specific tasks or components, such as individual questions on a test or sections of an assignment. It provides detailed feedback on each element, but it may not always reflect the student’s overall performance or progress.

Grading, on the other hand, looks at the bigger picture. A grade is typically based on a range of tasks, performance measures, and assessments over a certain period. This allows for a more holistic view of a student’s capabilities, strengths, and weaknesses.

2. Precision vs Generalization 

Marking is generally more precise because it is based on the exact performance of a student on specific components of an assessment. Each question or task is marked individually, providing detailed feedback on what was correct or incorrect. However, this precision may sometimes lead to errors in judgment or interpretation, especially if the teacher’s criteria are unclear or subjective.

Grading is more generalized, as it involves assigning a single value (usually a letter or a GPA) that reflects the student’s overall performance. This can be less detailed, but it reduces the chances of measurement errors, as it is based on a broader view of the student’s abilities over time.

3. Feedback Style 

In marking systems, feedback is usually more detailed and task-specific. Teachers may highlight individual strengths and weaknesses in the student’s work, pointing out exactly where improvement is needed. This can be very helpful for students who prefer specific guidance on how to improve their work.

In contrast, feedback in grading systems tends to be more general. While some systems may still provide comments, the primary focus is on the grade itself. This can be less helpful for students who are looking for detailed advice on how to improve specific aspects of their performance.

4. Motivational Impact 

Marking can have varying motivational impacts depending on how the feedback is delivered. Some students may find it motivating to see exactly where they went wrong and how they can improve. However, for others, the detailed breakdown of marks can be discouraging, especially if they are struggling in specific areas.

Grading, however, provides a clear and easily understandable benchmark for success. Students often find grades more motivating because they represent a single, definitive measure of achievement. High grades can provide a sense of accomplishment, while low grades can serve as a wake-up call to improve.

Grading in education is the application of standardized measurements to evaluate different levels of student achievement in a course. Grades can be expressed as letters (usually A to F), as a range (for example, 1 to 6), percentages, or as numbers out of a possible total (often out of 100). The exact system that is used varies worldwide.

Both grading and marking systems are considered the same thing; however, both are different things. Both grading and marking are used as performance evaluation tools for students. 

In contrast to grading systems, which convert scores into letter grades, marking systems use numbers to evaluate students’ performance. 

Assessment	Marking System	Grading System
Definition	The marking system is the process of providing detailed feedback or assigning grades. In marking, students are scored between 1 and 100.	Grading is the process of assigning a letter or a number to a student’s overall performance. The grading system contains A, B, C, or D, or it can be assessed through Grade Point Average (GPA).
Evaluation	In the marking system, the scores are evaluated as raw numbers which students have achieved in their examinations.	In the grading system, the raw scores are converted into alphabetic scores such as A, B, C or GPA.
Feedback	The marking system provides proper feedback, allowing students to understand their strengths and weaknesses.	The grading system provides very limited feedback, due to which students mostly focus on grade points.
Focus	The main focus of the marking system is to provide detailed and precise analysis of students’ performance.	The main focus of the grading system is to measure overall performance of students based on subjects and exams.
Example	In the marking system, students receive a numeric mark range for exams or assessments, such as 50 out of 100.	In the grading system, students receive grades in alphabetic scores such as A, B, C or D for their performance in the examination.

This system provides feedback to students and allows educators to assess their progress and identify areas for improvement

Marking and grading are considered the same thing; however, both are different concepts. The marking and grading system is mostly used in the examination factor, which showcases the performance of students. 

Marking and grading are both used as assessments to evaluate students’ performance. Marking systems are numbers which are used to assess students’ performance, whereas grading systems are alphabets which translate the scores into letter grades. 

While marking concentrates on individual evaluations,  grading focuses on students’ overall performance in a course. Marking and grading are both an essential element that aids in assessing student performance and comprehension. 

Although they both have the same objective of assessing student work, their methods, applications and effects on learning are very different. 

What is the Marking System

Marking is the procedure of providing detailed feedback or assigning grades to different parts of student assignments, such as essays, projects or tests. By highlighting the work’s specifics, this method enables educators to identify both its advantages and areas for improvement. 

Feedback is often more qualitative, focusing on the nuances of student performance rather than just the final outcome. Students typically receive written feedback on how to advance their skills and knowledge. 

This also allows students to assess their weaknesses and areas of improvement. The marking system mostly focuses on the number system or percentage, where students are scored between 1 and 100. It entails giving particular parts of a student’s work descriptive or numerical scores.

What is the Grading System

Grading is the process of assigning a letter or a number to a student’s overall performance based on a predetermined set of criteria. 

This approach is usually more quantitative, which aims to provide a summary of a student’s performance in a course or subject. 

Grades serve as a quick reference for both teachers and students and they usually influence academic choices like graduation, eligibility, course, placement, scholarship and so on. 

The grading system is a broader aspect of evaluation based on alphabetic grades, such as A, B, C, or D, or it can be assessed through Grade Point Average (GPA). 

Unlike the marking system, which only focuses only on the details of a task, grading considers a student’s overall performance or learning objectives across a range of activities. The grading system provides detailed objectives of marks achieved.

• • In countries that use a letter-based scale, the letter E is often skipped. For example, most US schools use the grades A, B, C, D, and F. The symbols + or – may be used to indicate scores at the high or low end of that letter’s respective range.

• • In countries that use a numerical scale, the lowest possible grade may be 1 or 0 (although 0 is often reserved for incompletes).

• • Scoring systems shown pertain primarily to government-funded primary and secondary schools. Preschools, private schools, and tertiary schools (colleges, trade schools) may use entirely different grading systems.

• • The Cumulative Grade Point Average (CGPA) average reflects all grades earned for all semesters. It is determined by dividing the sum total of all grade points by the sum total of all credit hours attempted.

• • A Grade Point Average (GPA) is calculated by dividing the total amount of grade points earned by the total amount of GPA credits attempted.

GRADING SYSTEMS BY COUNTRY 2025
No	COUNTRY	HIGH SCORE	LOW SCORE	LOW PASSING GRADE
1	Rwanda	A	F	E
2	Nigeria	Varies	Varies	Varies
3	United States	A	F	D
4	Bangladesh	A	F	D
5	Thailand	A	F	D
6	United Kingdom	A	F	D
7	Kenya	A	E	D
8	Cameroon	A	E	C
9	Bhutan	A	E	D
10	Papua New Guinea	A	D	C
11	Sweden	A	E	E
12	Hong Kong	A	F	D
13	Norway	A	F	E
14	New Zealand	A	E	C
15	Kuwait	A	F	D
16	Belize	A	F	D
17	Bahamas	A	F	D
18	Barbados	A	G	F
19	India	100		65
20	China	100		60
21	Indonesia	100		54
22	Ethiopia	100		50
23	Egypt	100		50
24	South Africa	100		40
25	Iraq	100		60
26	Afghanistan	100		40
27	Malaysia	100		40
28	Saudi Arabia	100		60
29	Australia	100		50
30	Syria	100		50
31	Israel	100	1	56
32	Nicaragua	100		70
33	Costa Rica	100		65
34	Panama	100		71
35	Eswatini	100		40
36	Malta	100		70
37	Italy	30		18
38	San Marino	30		18
39	Iran	20		10
40	France	20		10
41	Algeria	20		10
42	Morocco	20		10
43	Peru	20		10
44	Venezuela	20		10
45	Chad	20		8
46	Benin	20		10
47	Tunisia	20	1	10
48	Belgium	20		10
49	Portugal	20	1	10
50	Lebanon	20		7
51	Luxembourg	20	1	12
52	Ukraine	12	1	4
53	Denmark	12	-3	2
54	Uruguay	12	1	7
55	Canada	100%		60%
56	Brazil	10		6
57	Mexico	10		6
58	Vietnam	10	1	5
59	Spain	10		5
60	Argentina	10	1	4
61	Romania	10	1	5
62	Netherlands	10	1	6
63	Ecuador	10		7
64	Greece	10		5
65	Belarus	10	1	3
66	Finland	10		4
67	Moldova	10	1	5
68	Armenia	10		5
69	Lithuania	10	1	5
70	Albania	10	1	5
71	Latvia	10	1	4
72	Cyprus	10		5
73	Iceland	10
74	Andorra	10	1	5
75	Chile	7	1	4
76	Switzerland	6	1	4
77	Bulgaria	6	2	3
78	Singapore	6	1	4
79	Russia	5	1	2
80	Japan	5	1	2
81	Philippines	5	1	2.5
82	Turkey	5	1	2
83	Colombia	5		3
84	Poland	5	2	3
85	Uzbekistan	5	2	3
86	Kazakhstan	5	1	3
87	Honduras	5	1	3
88	Czech Republic	5	1	3
89	Hungary	5	1	2
90	Kyrgyzstan	5	1	2
91	Paraguay	5	1	2
92	Serbia	5	1	2
93	Slovakia	5	1	2
94	Croatia	5	1	2
95	Bosnia and Herzegovina	5	1	2
96	Slovenia	5	1	2
97	North Macedonia	5	1	2
98	Estonia	5		1
99	Montenegro	5	1	2
100	Jordan	4		2
101	Germany	1	6	4
102	Malawi	1	9	8
103	Austria	1	5	4
104	Ireland	1	8	6
105	Namibia	1	4	4
106	Mauritius	1	9	8

Source : World wide population 2025

Benefits of the Marking System

The marking system helps in maintaining consistency as well as allows for equitable assessment. The marking system uses predetermined standards which help in enhancing students’ motivation and sense of development. 

It offers a methodical framework for giving feedback that helps in understanding useful information that directs students’ development. It reduces the likelihood that the assignment specifications will be misunderstood. 

A supportive learning method that promotes advancement is also fostered by the marking system. 

1. Transparent Marking System

The marking system provides a clear and transparent evaluation, which helps students comprehend how their work is evaluated. This clarity increases confidence in the assessment system while also simplifying the grading process. 

Students are more inclined to interact with the content and work toward improvement. Through this, they are aware of the expectations and the criteria used to evaluate their performance. 

2. Self-Assessment

A key component of a successful self-evaluation process is comprehensive feedback. Students are urged to critically evaluate their performance by getting helpful feedback on their work. 

Through this reflection, they are able to recognise their areas of strength and weakness, which enhances their confidence. 

3. Clarity

Marking system provides clarity which provides detailed remarks and recommendations in the marking system. It deepens their comprehension of the subject matter by improving their abilities and assisting them in grasping difficult ideas. 

Clear and useful feedback allows students to concentrate on their areas of weakness and expand on what they already know, which eventually leads to a deeper understanding of the subject matter. 

4. Uniformity

The marking system provides consistency in evaluation across various assignments and subjects. All students are evaluated according to the same standards and criteria, which encourages fairness in the evaluation process. 

All students can benefit from a positive learning environment. Through this, teachers use consistent marking procedures to reduce biases and inconsistencies. 

5. Remote System

This adaptability makes it possible to use a variety of assessment techniques to meet different learning needs. Technology can be incorporated into remote marking systems to support personalised learning paths, enable peer-to-peer learning assessments and give prompt feedback. 

This method helps in easy assessment and beneficial components of the learning process in any context by adjusting to the online format. 

Drawbacks of the Marking System

There are various advantages of a marking system that helps in assessing students’ performance. However, along with the students’ performance, there are also a number of disadvantages that may affect the learning process. 

Subjectivity in grading is a major challenge that results in unfair evaluations due to which it causes individual prejudices. Students may become frustrated because they believe their grades are unfair, and the marking system’s credibility may be damaged by this subjectivity. 

1. Subjectivity

Subjectivity is a major cause in the marking process, which leads to inconsistent evaluations. 

Due to subjectivity, students find bias, which hinders their academic performance and causes them to score poorly in their exams. Even due to subjectivity, it also interests students and teachers’ assessment of education.

2. Measurement Errors

Measurement errors in marking can arise when the assessment criteria are not clearly defined or understood. 

These inaccuracies can significantly affect the reliability of the evaluation process. Without well-established benchmarks, the likelihood of misinterpretation increases, leading to discrepancies in grading. 

3. Lack of Context

Marking may sometimes fail to consider the broader context of a student’s performance or personal circumstances. 

Factors such as individual challenges, learning styles, and external pressures can significantly influence a student’s ability to perform well. 

When these contextual elements are overlooked, it can lead to unfair evaluations that do not accurately represent a student’s capabilities or efforts. 

4. Unfair Assessments

Students may feel disadvantaged if the marking criteria are not clearly communicated or understood. When assessment expectations are ambiguous, it can result in confusion and frustration among students. 

This lack of clarity can lead to feelings of inadequacy, as students may struggle to meet undefined standards. 

5. Focus on External

An overemphasis on external factors in the marking process can detract from students’ intrinsic motivation to learn. 

When assessments prioritise grades, rankings, or other external rewards, students may become more focused on achieving high scores rather than cultivating a genuine desire for knowledge and understanding. 

Benefits of the Grading System

The grading system has lots of benefits that provide a smooth assessment process. It provides teachers a standardised and transparent way to evaluate student performance, enabling them to accurately assess and convey academic achievements. 

Students are able to identify areas for improvement and set specific learning goals, which also helps them understand their strengths and weaknesses. 

1. Standardize Evaluation

Standardized evaluation through grading establishes a uniform framework for assessing student performance across various subjects and educational institutions. This consistency is crucial as it allows for meaningful comparisons between students, classes, and schools.

2. Facilitate Evaluation

The grading system significantly simplifies the evaluation process for educators, making it more efficient and manageable. 

By providing a structured approach to assessing student performance, grading allows teachers to focus on delivering quality instruction while effectively managing their assessment responsibilities. 

3. Objective Assessment

A key advantage of the grading system is its reliance on established criteria for assigning grades, which helps to reduce subjectivity in evaluations. 

This objectivity promotes fairness and consistency in the assessment process, as educators adhere to clear standards when evaluating student work. 

4. Evaluation

Grades serve as a clear and concise summary of student achievement, making it easy to communicate performance levels to various stakeholders, including parents, administrators, and future educational institutions. 

This clarity is essential for fostering open communication about student progress and areas needing improvement.

5. Track Record

The grading system creates a historical record of student performance that can be invaluable for future academic and career opportunities. This record not only reflects a student’s achievements but also serves as a tool for planning their educational paths.

Drawbacks of the Grading System

The grading system has several benefits that enhance the learning capacity of students and provide easy access to education. 

However, along with so many benefits, it has so many disadvantages that hinder students’ performance and sometimes causes biased results. 

Grades can also cause students to feel excessive pressure and anxiety which reduces students’ performance and hinders their potential to achieve future goals.

1. Misrepresenting

Grades may not accurately reflect a student’s understanding or abilities, especially if they are based solely on exams or standardised tests. 

This kind of misrepresentation can happen, especially when exams or standardised tests are the only basis for assessments, which might not fully represent a student’s knowledge or abilities. 

2. Bias:

Grading can be influenced by factors unrelated to student performance, such as teacher bias or discrepancies in grading scales. 

Inconsistencies in the grades can result from a variety of factors including differences in grading scales, personal relationships and teacher bias. This hampers students’ performance and hinders their true potential.

3. Time Consuming: 

The process of assigning grades can be labor-intensive, particularly in large classes, leading to potential delays in feedback. Grading takes a lot of time which may cause delays in giving students the feedback they need to learn and develop. 

Students may lose out on important chances to recognize their errors and enhance their performance if feedback is not given promptly. 

4. Reduce Limitation

The focus on grades may encourage a narrow view of success, where students prioritize achieving high marks over genuine learning and understanding. 

This emphasis on grades could cause students to take a cursory approach to their studies where they are more focused on fulfilling predetermined grading requirements than they are on really understanding the subject matter. 

5. External Rewards

The grading system can lead to a focus on external motivation, where students prioritize grades over the internal value of learning. 

The grading system often sees extracurricular activities and assessments, where students prioritize grades as a primary measure of success rather than valuing the intrinsic benefits of learning.

Conclusion

With their own advantages and disadvantages, marking and grading are both crucial elements of the educational assessment environment. 

While grading offers a consistent way to assess overall performance, marking offers specific feedback that can improve learning and encourage student development.

Educators can select the best assessment techniques for their students by being aware of the advantages and disadvantages of each system, which will ultimately create a more encouraging and productive learning environment. 

Teachers can develop a thorough assessment strategy that supports both academic success and personal growth by striking a balance between the two methods. 

Dr Havugimana Alexis Quotes

1. ”Students who don’t read learning materials are often unmotivated in their studies, and their creativity depends only on their feelings or personal attachment”. Dr Havugimana Alexis

2.” Reading your course materials inspires the way you’ll live in the future”. Dr. Havugimana Alexis

3. When you learn, you gain knowledge, habits, abilities, values, and tastes that no one can ever take away. Dr. Havugimana Alexis
4. Education is the key that opens all advantages in every where and every area of work. Dr. Havugimana Alexis
5. “A true education is shown by what you remember and apply’’Dr. Havugimana Alexis
6. ”Books preserve history; without history, the future is lost”. Dr. Havugimana Alexis
7. Learning instills knowledge, behaviors, skills, values, and preferences that remain with you for life. Dr. Havugimana Alexis

• ” Grades should guide, not define; not potential but they measure performance of population .”  Havugimana Alexis.

8. “Marks represent more than numbers; they show how much a student has grown and learned.”Dr Havugimana Alexis.
9. “Real education isn’t measured by grades, but by what knowledge remains after the exam.””Dr Havugimana Alexis.
10. “Teachers show you how to do things both in theory and practice—but applying them is up to you.”Dr Havugimana Alexis.
11. Learning is a lifelong journey, both mentally and physically. Dr. Havugimana Alexis
12. From mind to body, learning is a perpetual journey that lasts a lifetime. Dr. Havugimana Alexis
13. “Learning involves gaining knowledge and skills via lessons, analysis, and familiarization.” Dr. Havugimana Alexis
14. “Through instruction, critical examination, and exposure to new concepts, learning allows us to develop knowledge and skills.” Dr. Havugimana Alexis
15. “Rewards follow effort and perseverance.” Dr. Havugimana Alexis
16. Without books, there is no history; without history, the future has no direction.  Dr. Havugimana Alexis.
17. “Education is the master key to all paths of the future. Those who get ready today shape tomorrow, and their wisdom will keep them on top forever.”Dr. Havugimana Alexis.

References

1. 1. Zou, Tao; Zhang, Yue; Zhou, Bo (12 April 2022). “Does GPA matter for university graduates’ wages? New evidence revisited”. PLOS ONE. 17 (4): e0266981. Bibcode:2022PLoSO..1766981Z. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0266981. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 9004755. PMID 35413073.

1. 1.  “History of the letter grading system”. Stacker. Retrieved 31 October 2024.

1. 1. Pierson, George W. (1701–1976). “Yale Book of Numbers” (PDF). {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)

1. 1.  Schinske, Jeffrey; Tanner, Kimberly (2014). “Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently)”. CBE: Life Sciences Education. 13 (2): 159–166. doi:10.1187/cbe.cbe-14-03-0054. ISSN 1931-7913. PMC 4041495. PMID 26086649.

1. 1. Christopher Stray, “From Oral to Written Examinations: Cambridge, Oxford and Dublin 1700–1914”, History of Universities 20:2 (2005), 94–95.https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199289288.003.0004

1. 1. “Stress blockiert Kinder: Warum Noten in der Schule nicht zukunftsfähig sind”. FOCUS Online (in German). Retrieved 17 December 2020.

1. 1. “Das Dilemma mit den Schulnoten”. n-tv.de (in German). Retrieved 17 December 2020.

1. 1. Ammel, Rainer (2017). Gute Noten ohne Stress: Ein Lehrer verrät die besten Tipps und Tricks, um das Gymnasium erfolgreich zu bestehen. Heyne Verlag. ISBN 978364119728
   2. 5.